AI that stays on the record

Ask your case file anything. Every answer points to the exact line.

DocketSense reads the entire record, answers in plain language, and shows you the source: the precise sentence, on the page it came from. No outside knowledge. No invented facts. Nothing you can't check.

See it on your files → How it holds up

You asked

Where does the record address causation for the shoulder injury?

Orthopedic Consult, Patel, MD p. 14

…range of motion limited to 90 degrees on the right, with tenderness on palpation of the

acromioclavicular joint. In my opinion, the labral tear is causally related to the collision of record and is not degenerative in origin.

The patient was advised to continue physical therapy and…

Source · highlighted on page 14

01 / 02 / 03

Answers you can hand to a partner.

Generic AI guesses, then sounds confident about it. DocketSense works the opposite way: it speaks only from the documents in the matter, and it takes you to the words it relied on.

01 / Ask

In plain language

Type a question the way you'd ask a colleague. "What did the treating physician conclude?" "Where does the agreement limit liability?"

02 / Grounded

Only from the file

The answer is drawn strictly from the documents on the matter. If the record is silent, it says so instead of filling the gap.

03 / Verify

Straight to the source

Every finding carries a citation. Click it and the exact sentence is highlighted on its page, ready to read in context.

Why teams trust it

Built to be checked, not taken on faith.

On the record, always

Answers come from the case documents, never from the model's general knowledge or the open internet.

“

Word for word

Findings quote the record verbatim, with the document name and page number attached.

⤷

Verify in one click

The source sentence is highlighted where it lives in the PDF, so nothing has to be trusted blind.

∅

Nothing invented

When the file doesn't answer the question, it returns "no relevant information found" rather than guessing.

The honest comparison

Why not just use ChatGPT?

A general assistant is great at drafting an email and dangerous on a case file. The gap isn't intelligence. It's whether the answer is anchored to your evidence, and whether you'd stake a filing on it.

A general AI subscription

DocketSense

Answers from

Its training data, and a best guess when it doesn't know.

Only the documents in your matter. Nothing else.

Citations

Often invented. Fabricated cases have gotten lawyers sanctioned.

Real, to the document and page, highlighted so you can verify each one.

Your case file

You paste in the snippets that fit the context window.

The whole record is read and searchable, thousands of pages.

Confidentiality

Client records pasted into a consumer tool, sometimes used to train it.

Files stay in your environment. Nothing trains a public model.

Work product

A blank box you have to prompt from scratch each time.

Timelines, letters, discovery, and analysis, built for the matter.

Under review

Output a partner can't trace or defend.

Every claim opens to its source for a supervising attorney.

What it does

One engine, across the matter.

The same grounded, cited foundation powers everything below, read it, chronicle it, draft from it.

Witnesses

Provider & witness roster

Every treating provider, expert, and records custodian pulled from the file, each backed by the pages that prove it, ready to build your witness list.

Ask

Question the case file

Chat over every document in a matter and get answers with citations to the exact page.

Cite

Precise source highlighting

Jump from any citation to the single highlighted line it came from, no hunting through the file.

Chronicle

Timelines, built for you

A dated chronology of the matter, assembled automatically from the documents.

Discovery

Interrogatories & responses

First-draft discovery generated from the facts already on file, in your firm's voice.

Draft

First drafts from the file

Letters and case documents produced from the record and handed to you ready to edit.

Intake

Clean, sorted records

Boilerplate like cover letters and authorization forms is filtered out, so it never surfaces as evidence.

Analyze

Modules for your matter type

Structured extractions tuned to the work. Proven in personal injury; configurable to yours.

Connect

Your case-management system

Read-only sync so matters are labeled and organized the way your team already works.

In production

Live today at a personal-injury firm.

Their team uses DocketSense to read thousands of pages of medical records, build treatment timelines, draft demand letters, and surface gaps and inconsistencies, with every finding traceable to the source page. The engine underneath doesn't care what kind of matter it is. It reads the record and it cites the record.

Every finding

tied to a document and page

Whole file

read, not sampled

One click

from claim to source

Your data, your control

It reads your files. It doesn't touch your systems.

↦

Read-only integrations

DocketSense pulls from your case-management system to organize matters. It never writes back or changes your records.

⌘

Your documents stay yours

Case files are used to answer your questions, not to train a public model on your clients' matters.

✓

Auditable by design

Because every claim opens to its source, a reviewer can trace any answer back to the page in seconds.

◑

Fits your practice

The analysis is configured to your matter type and workflow, not forced into someone else's template.

See it on your work

Put it in front of your own documents.

The fastest way to judge grounded AI is to point it at a real matter and try to break the citations. Bring a file. We'll show you the answers, and the exact lines they came from.

Book a walkthrough → Bring one of your own matters